MAQT Stats 1995-6

The following table shows the final individual player statistics for the 1995-6 season. Khon and Zeke both have a non-integral number of games played since they rotated on the B team at Penn Bowl.

Player GP TU Int PPG TU/GP Int/GP TU/Int

Dave G. 166 690 130 37.6506 4.1566 0.7831 5.3077

Dave V. 132 499 96 34.1667 3.7803 0.7273 5.1979

Arthur 212 757 78 33.8679 3.5708 0.3679 9.7051

Matt 205 795 218 33.4634 3.8780 1.0634 3.6468

Adam 128 414 55 30.1953 3.2344 0.4297 7.5273

Dave H. 213 669 122 28.5446 3.1408 0.5728 5.4836

Vishnu 69 189 34 24.9275 2.7391 0.4928 5.5588

Rob 65 164 43 21.9231 2.5231 0.6615 3.8140

Rachel 14 21 3 13.9286 1.5000 0.2143 7.0000

Zeke 107.5 116 21 9.8140 1.0791 0.1953 5.5238

Curtis 92 76 4 8.0435 0.8261 0.0435 19.0000

Jason 70 45 5 6.0714 0.6429 0.0714 9.0000

Michelle 88 60 15 5.9659 0.6818 0.1705 4.0000

Laura 11 7 1 5.9091 0.6364 0.0909 7.0000

Dave Z. 26 12 1 4.4231 0.4615 0.0385 12.0000

Lisa 14 6 1 3.9286 0.4286 0.0714 6.0000

Khon 122.5 45 1 3.6327 0.3673 0.0082 45.0000

Rajarshi 14 6 3 3.2143 0.4286 0.2143 2.0000

Rick 25 9 2 3.2000 0.3600 0.0800 4.5000

Diamond 29 3 1 0.8621 0.1034 0.0345 3.0000

Vic 13 1 2 0.0000 0.0769 0.1538 0.5000

Player	GP	TU	Int	PPG	TU/GP	Int/GP	TU/Int
Dave G.	166	690	130	37.6506	4.1566	0.7831	5.3077
Dave V.	132	499	96	34.1667	3.7803	0.7273	5.1979
Arthur	212	757	78	33.8679	3.5708	0.3679	9.7051
Matt	205	795	218	33.4634	3.8780	1.0634	3.6468
Adam	128	414	55	30.1953	3.2344	0.4297	7.5273
Dave H.	213	669	122	28.5446	3.1408	0.5728	5.4836
Vishnu	69	189	34	24.9275	2.7391	0.4928	5.5588
Rob	65	164	43	21.9231	2.5231	0.6615	3.8140
Rachel	14	21	3	13.9286	1.5000	0.2143	7.0000
Zeke	107.5	116	21	9.8140	1.0791	0.1953	5.5238
Curtis	92	76	4	8.0435	0.8261	0.0435	19.0000
Jason	70	45	5	6.0714	0.6429	0.0714	9.0000
Michelle	88	60	15	5.9659	0.6818	0.1705	4.0000
Laura	11	7	1	5.9091	0.6364	0.0909	7.0000
Dave Z.	26	12	1	4.4231	0.4615	0.0385	12.0000
Lisa	14	6	1	3.9286	0.4286	0.0714	6.0000
Khon	122.5	45	1	3.6327	0.3673	0.0082	45.0000
Rajarshi	14	6	3	3.2143	0.4286	0.2143	2.0000
Rick	25	9	2	3.2000	0.3600	0.0800	4.5000
Diamond	29	3	1	0.8621	0.1034	0.0345	3.0000
Vic	13	1	2	0.0000	0.0769	0.1538	0.5000

Heinrich Bowl

We sent one team to Heinrich Bowl this year, and went undefeated; however, in an exhibition match against Tech A after the tournament, we were closely beaten 305-240 in a game moderated by Tom Waters.

Opponent Team Score Matt C. Dave G. Dave H. Arthur F.

Florida A 390-185 1-1 4-0 3-0 5-0

Georgia Tech Freshmen B 505-30 3-2 3-1 4-1 6-0

Memphis II 365-90 0-1 6-0 2-3 5-0

Florida II 460-100 2-1 5-3 2-0 5-1

Vanderbilt 390-90 2-0 2-2 5-0 4-1

Wofford 450-60 2-1 5-1 2-0 5-0

Tech Frosh A (Joyceman) 565-75 6-0 1-0 3-0 6-0

Emory A 355-185 2-2 3-0 5-0 1-1

Emory B 505-35 3-1 5-0 2-1 6-0

Oglethorpe 325-155 2-0 5-1 1-2 4-1

NC State 345-185 2-4 1-1 3-0 6-1

Tennessee A 425-165 2-0 7-0 2-2 2-1

Tennessee B 515-90 5-0 4-0 3-0 4-2

Memphis 350-140 4-2 3-1 1-3 3-0

TOTALS 5945-1585 20.357 ppg 35.000 ppg 22.857 ppg 41.071 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Matt C.	Dave G.	Dave H.	Arthur F.
Florida A	390-185	1-1	4-0	3-0	5-0
Georgia Tech Freshmen B	505-30	3-2	3-1	4-1	6-0
Memphis II	365-90	0-1	6-0	2-3	5-0
Florida II	460-100	2-1	5-3	2-0	5-1
Vanderbilt	390-90	2-0	2-2	5-0	4-1
Wofford	450-60	2-1	5-1	2-0	5-0
Tech Frosh A (Joyceman)	565-75	6-0	1-0	3-0	6-0
Emory A	355-185	2-2	3-0	5-0	1-1
Emory B	505-35	3-1	5-0	2-1	6-0
Oglethorpe	325-155	2-0	5-1	1-2	4-1
NC State	345-185	2-4	1-1	3-0	6-1
Tennessee A	425-165	2-0	7-0	2-2	2-1
Tennessee B	515-90	5-0	4-0	3-0	4-2
Memphis	350-140	4-2	3-1	1-3	3-0
TOTALS	5945-1585	20.357 ppg	35.000 ppg	22.857 ppg	41.071 ppg

NLIT

Maryland A

Penn State's Nittany Lion Invitational Tournament was our second tournament win of the year, beating Virginia in the finals by 15. UMCP's new addition Dave Vacca showed his College Bowel ability in his first tournament as a Maryland grad student.

Opponent Team Score Arthur F. Dave H. Dave V. Matt C.

Cornell 225-200 3-0 1-0 3-0 2-0

Michigan FLQ 375-95 4-0 6-0 6-2 0-0

Michigan A 305-160 5-1 3-0 2-0 1-1

Penn A 150-155 1-0 2-0 4-1 1-4

Loyola B 375-45 3-0 3-0 3-2 5-0

WMU Reptile 305-175 1-0 1-1 5-0 3-0

"Not" Virginia 210-215 1-0 1-0 4-2 3-1

Pitt Victoria's Secret 280-30 2-0 3-0 4-1 3-0

Roanoke 230-180 2-1 3-0 5-0 0-1

WMU Scorpion 240-120 6-0 3-0 1-0 2-2

Johns Hopkins A 255-310 3-0 1-0 4-1 2-1

Ohio State 235-60 3-0 4-0 3-0 3-0

Playoff: Michigan 4H 185-135 5-1 0-0 4-1 1-1

Playoff: Cornell 310-225 4-0 3-0 3-0 2-1

Playoff: Virginia 260-245 2-0 2-0 6-0 3-1

TOTALS 3940-2350 29.000 ppg 23.667 ppg 34.667 ppg 16.333 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Arthur F.	Dave H.	Dave V.	Matt C.
Cornell	225-200	3-0	1-0	3-0	2-0
Michigan FLQ	375-95	4-0	6-0	6-2	0-0
Michigan A	305-160	5-1	3-0	2-0	1-1
Penn A	150-155	1-0	2-0	4-1	1-4
Loyola B	375-45	3-0	3-0	3-2	5-0
WMU Reptile	305-175	1-0	1-1	5-0	3-0
"Not" Virginia	210-215	1-0	1-0	4-2	3-1
Pitt Victoria's Secret	280-30	2-0	3-0	4-1	3-0
Roanoke	230-180	2-1	3-0	5-0	0-1
WMU Scorpion	240-120	6-0	3-0	1-0	2-2
Johns Hopkins A	255-310	3-0	1-0	4-1	2-1
Ohio State	235-60	3-0	4-0	3-0	3-0
Playoff: Michigan 4H	185-135	5-1	0-0	4-1	1-1
Playoff: Cornell	310-225	4-0	3-0	3-0	2-1
Playoff: Virginia	260-245	2-0	2-0	6-0	3-1
TOTALS	3940-2350	29.000 ppg	23.667 ppg	34.667 ppg	16.333 ppg

Maryland Gravy (B Team)

Maryland Gravy finished in 6th place in their division with a 7-5 record, led by sophomore Adam Fine.

Opponent Team Score Curtis L. Adam F. Khon L. Jason D.

Michigan 220-100 2-0 5-0 1-0 2-0

Michigan 4 Horsemen 35-415 0-0 1-1 0-0 1-0

Dickinson 200-60 0-0 9-0 0-0 0-0

Swarthmore 80-210 3-0 1-1 0-0 0-0

WMU Subzero 325-50 2-0 8-1 0-0 1-0

Pitt J.C. 140-265 2-0 5-1 0-0 1-0

Penn 170-150 3-0 6-0 0-0 0-0

JHU B 125-105 2-0 4-1 0-0 2-0

GW 10-310 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-0

Princeton 35-395 0-0 2-0 0-0 0-0

Cornell 190-155 2-0 10-0 0-0 0-1

Loyola 110-100 0-0 9-1 0-0 0-0

TOTALS 1640-2315 13.333 ppg 48.333 ppg 0.833 ppg 5.417 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Curtis L.	Adam F.	Khon L.	Jason D.
Michigan	220-100	2-0	5-0	1-0	2-0
Michigan 4 Horsemen	35-415	0-0	1-1	0-0	1-0
Dickinson	200-60	0-0	9-0	0-0	0-0
Swarthmore	80-210	3-0	1-1	0-0	0-0
WMU Subzero	325-50	2-0	8-1	0-0	1-0
Pitt J.C.	140-265	2-0	5-1	0-0	1-0
Penn	170-150	3-0	6-0	0-0	0-0
JHU B	125-105	2-0	4-1	0-0	2-0
GW	10-310	0-0	1-0	0-0	0-0
Princeton	35-395	0-0	2-0	0-0	0-0
Cornell	190-155	2-0	10-0	0-0	0-1
Loyola	110-100	0-0	9-1	0-0	0-0
TOTALS	1640-2315	13.333 ppg	48.333 ppg	0.833 ppg	5.417 ppg

UNC

Maryland A

Maryland A suffered two close defeats, one rather large one, and a forfeit in this tournament of biscuitry, placing 5th in the field.

Opponent Team Score Arthur F. Vishnu J. Dave H. Dave G.

Hampden-Sydney 450-50 2-1 2-1 3-0 8-1

Tech A 145-215 2-0 1-1 0-1 3-1

Duke 345-195 7-1 0-0 1-0 3-3

Wake Forest 425-95 1-1 2-0 4-0 7-2

UNC 385-120 2-0 2-3 0-0 7-1

Tech B (w/Jim) 65-575 0-1 1-0 1-1 1-0

Emory 205-215 2-0 2-1 1-2 3-3

UVA 280-255 1-0 3-2 4-1 1-0

NC State 350-50 4-1 2-1 1-0 4-0

MD B 445-160 7-0 0-0 2-2 4-0

TOTALS 3095-1930 25.500 ppg 10.500 ppg 13.500 ppg 35.500 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Arthur F.	Vishnu J.	Dave H.	Dave G.
Hampden-Sydney	450-50	2-1	2-1	3-0	8-1
Tech A	145-215	2-0	1-1	0-1	3-1
Duke	345-195	7-1	0-0	1-0	3-3
Wake Forest	425-95	1-1	2-0	4-0	7-2
UNC	385-120	2-0	2-3	0-0	7-1
Tech B (w/Jim)	65-575	0-1	1-0	1-1	1-0
Emory	205-215	2-0	2-1	1-2	3-3
UVA	280-255	1-0	3-2	4-1	1-0
NC State	350-50	4-1	2-1	1-0	4-0
MD B	445-160	7-0	0-0	2-2	4-0
TOTALS	3095-1930	25.500 ppg	10.500 ppg	13.500 ppg	35.500 ppg

Maryland Biscuits

This team lived up to its name, as team captain Matt Colvin's car troubles resulted in a forfeit for the A team to Methodist, but the second team ended up finishing respectably in 6th place overall.

Opponent Team Score Khon L. Matt C. Adam F. Michelle C.

Georgia Tech B 100-490 0-0 4-4 1-0 0-0

Emory 180-115 0-0 10-1 1-1 0-0

Virginia 260-290 0-0 4-1 4-0 1-0

NC State 260-215 0-0 6-1 3-0 0-0

Hampden-Sydney 130-40 1-0 3-4 2-0 0-0

Georgia Tech A 195-400 0-0 5-1 2-0 0-0

Duke 295-70 0-0 10-2 3-0 0-0

Wake Forest 250-90 0-0 10-2 0-0 0-0

UNC Freshmen 405-40 0-0 10-1 3-1 1-0

Methodist 320-40 2-0 9-1 2-0 0-0

Maryland A 160-445 0-0 5-1 1-0 1-0

TOTALS 2555-2235 2.727 ppg 60.455 ppg 19.091 ppg 2.727 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Khon L.	Matt C.	Adam F.	Michelle C.
Georgia Tech B	100-490	0-0	4-4	1-0	0-0
Emory	180-115	0-0	10-1	1-1	0-0
Virginia	260-290	0-0	4-1	4-0	1-0
NC State	260-215	0-0	6-1	3-0	0-0
Hampden-Sydney	130-40	1-0	3-4	2-0	0-0
Georgia Tech A	195-400	0-0	5-1	2-0	0-0
Duke	295-70	0-0	10-2	3-0	0-0
Wake Forest	250-90	0-0	10-2	0-0	0-0
UNC Freshmen	405-40	0-0	10-1	3-1	1-0
Methodist	320-40	2-0	9-1	2-0	0-0
Maryland A	160-445	0-0	5-1	1-0	1-0
TOTALS	2555-2235	2.727 ppg	60.455 ppg	19.091 ppg	2.727 ppg

Beltway Bandits

These Are the Daves I Know

This tournament, run by GWU, showed that, despite common misconceptions, Maryland does know its trash. The team, named after a Kids in the Hall sketch, compteted in the finals after winning a three-way tie with UVA's Punky Vishnu and MIT Mind the Gap. The Davinator, Dave-o-rama, Davarino and Dave were no match for Michigan Gerbil, however, losing 135-280.

Sadly, no stats exist for Maryland Dumb and Dumber, Matt Colvin and Vishnu Jejjala's team. Matt demonstrated his Kelly LeBrock and Salacious Crumm knowledge, and it is rumored that Vishnu condescended to answering a question on Harlan Ellison.

Opponent Team Score Adam F. Dave G. Dave V. Dave H.

Johns Hopkins 260-160 4-0 4-1 2-1 2-0

Delawhere in the World 190-90 3-0 4-3 1-0 1-0

Loyola Wakko 225-(-15) 1-0 4-0 5-1 1-1

Penn 310-55 1-0 3-0 8-1 1-0

GW Bet Your Life 370-25 0-0 5-0 7-0 2-1

Punky Vishnu 235-240 1-0 3-0 1-1 4-0

Mind The Gap 170-110 0-0 1-0 5-1 2-1

Swarthmore 365-40 1-0 4-0 7-2 2-1

Championship (vs. Gerbil) 135-280 2-0 1-1 1-0 2-1

TOTALS 2260-985 15.555 ppg 29.444 ppg 38.333 ppg 16.111 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Adam F.	Dave G.	Dave V.	Dave H.
Johns Hopkins	260-160	4-0	4-1	2-1	2-0
Delawhere in the World	190-90	3-0	4-3	1-0	1-0
Loyola Wakko	225-(-15)	1-0	4-0	5-1	1-1
Penn	310-55	1-0	3-0	8-1	1-0
GW Bet Your Life	370-25	0-0	5-0	7-0	2-1
Punky Vishnu	235-240	1-0	3-0	1-1	4-0
Mind The Gap	170-110	0-0	1-0	5-1	2-1
Swarthmore	365-40	1-0	4-0	7-2	2-1
Championship (vs. Gerbil)	135-280	2-0	1-1	1-0	2-1
TOTALS	2260-985	15.555 ppg	29.444 ppg	38.333 ppg	16.111 ppg

Wesselmania VII

Maryland's third tournament win came at NC State this year as we emerged undefeated at Wesselmania VII, despite strong competitions from ACF powerhouses like Tech, UNC, and Tennessee.

Opponent Team Score Matt C. Dave H. Dave G. Arthur F.

Methodist 340-195 4-1 4-0 1-0 2-0

Elon 315-(-10) 2-1 2-0 2-0 5-0

NCSU Wolves 550-5 6-0 6-1 3-1 3-0

Roanoke Heloise 270-65 3-1 1-2 5-4 3-0

UNCtuous 480-75 2-0 4-0 5-0 4-0

Duke 415-65 3-1 3-0 5-0 4-0

Wake Forest 400-140 3-0 3-0 1-2 6-0

Tech II 295-285 2-2 2-0 4-1 1-0

UNC-Greensboro 285-155 2-1 3-0 2-1 2-0

Wofford 340-165 2-2 3-0 3-1 3-1

Roanoke Abelard 300-20 2-1 1-0 7-2 2-1

UNCouth 290-250 3-2 4-1 2-0 2-1

Tennessee 275-155 2-1 2-0 4-0 2-0

Tech I 310-235 4-0 2-0 1-0 4-0

Wake Forest II 255-25 1-1 1-0 3-1 4-1

TOTALS 5120-1825 22.667 ppg 26.000 ppg 27.000 ppg 30.000 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Matt C.	Dave H.	Dave G.	Arthur F.
Methodist	340-195	4-1	4-0	1-0	2-0
Elon	315-(-10)	2-1	2-0	2-0	5-0
NCSU Wolves	550-5	6-0	6-1	3-1	3-0
Roanoke Heloise	270-65	3-1	1-2	5-4	3-0
UNCtuous	480-75	2-0	4-0	5-0	4-0
Duke	415-65	3-1	3-0	5-0	4-0
Wake Forest	400-140	3-0	3-0	1-2	6-0
Tech II	295-285	2-2	2-0	4-1	1-0
UNC-Greensboro	285-155	2-1	3-0	2-1	2-0
Wofford	340-165	2-2	3-0	3-1	3-1
Roanoke Abelard	300-20	2-1	1-0	7-2	2-1
UNCouth	290-250	3-2	4-1	2-0	2-1
Tennessee	275-155	2-1	2-0	4-0	2-0
Tech I	310-235	4-0	2-0	1-0	4-0
Wake Forest II	255-25	1-1	1-0	3-1	4-1
TOTALS	5120-1825	22.667 ppg	26.000 ppg	27.000 ppg	30.000 ppg

Princeton Orville Redenbacher

Bloody Maryland

While the A team was at Wesselmania, our second team made it to the quarterfinals at Princeton's tournament before losing a close game to Swarthmore.

Opponent Team Score Zeke B. Khon L. Dave V. Adam F.

Williams Rods 165-235 0-0 0-0 5-2 2- 1

Princeton Pompeii 135-70 0-0 0-0 5- 4 1-0

Penn Edina 310-80 0-0 0-0 6-0 7- 0

Duke 160-195 1-0 0-0 2-0 3-1

Anthony Hopkins 375-75 2-0 0-0 7- 0 7-0

Cornell A 210-215 1-0 0-0 6-3 3- 0

Delaware Bert 135-225 0-1 0-0 4-0 2- 0

BU Postwar Leaders 290-100 1-0 0-0 4- 0 6-0

Dickinson B 320-70 1-0 0-0 8-0 6- 1

Pitt 310-115 1-1 0-0 9-1 2-0

Dartmouth Roll 150-140 2-0 0-0 3- 1 2-0

Playoff: W. Rods 255-145 0-1 0-0 8- 1 3-0

Playoff: Swarthmore 310-380 0-0 0-0 6- 0 5-1

TOTALS 3125-2045 5.769 ppg 0 ppg 51.538 ppg 36.159 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Zeke B.	Khon L.	Dave V.	Adam F.
Williams Rods	165-235	0-0	0-0	5-2	2- 1
Princeton Pompeii	135-70	0-0	0-0	5- 4	1-0
Penn Edina	310-80	0-0	0-0	6-0	7- 0
Duke	160-195	1-0	0-0	2-0	3-1
Anthony Hopkins	375-75	2-0	0-0	7- 0	7-0
Cornell A	210-215	1-0	0-0	6-3	3- 0
Delaware Bert	135-225	0-1	0-0	4-0	2- 0
BU Postwar Leaders	290-100	1-0	0-0	4- 0	6-0
Dickinson B	320-70	1-0	0-0	8-0	6- 1
Pitt	310-115	1-1	0-0	9-1	2-0
Dartmouth Roll	150-140	2-0	0-0	3- 1	2-0
Playoff: W. Rods	255-145	0-1	0-0	8- 1	3-0
Playoff: Swarthmore	310-380	0-0	0-0	6- 0	5-1
TOTALS	3125-2045	5.769 ppg	0 ppg	51.538 ppg	36.159 ppg

MLK

Virginia proved to be our bane at Georgia Tech's MLK, as we lost twice to them on the last question of a round. Another defeat in the playoff round robin to Georgia Tech gave us a 4th place finish.

Opponent Team Score Matt C. Dave H. Vishnu J. Arthur F.

Wake Forest II 480-5 4-0 3-1 2-0 7- 0

Tech A 320-305 3-2 2-1 2-0 3- 0

Berry 380-115 3-0 3-0 1-1 6-0

South Carolina A 420-140 2-0 4-0 3- 1 5-0

UVA 265-335 3-0 2-0 2-0 1-0

Duke 300-135 1-1 3-1 3-0 3-0

Oglethorpe 315-30 3-1 3-1 3-1 4- 1

Memphis B 450-15 6-0 5-0 N/A 4- 1

Vanderbilt 445-115 2-1 1-1 3-1 8- 0

Playoff: Emory 325-210 4-1 3-0 3- 0 1-0

Playoff: UVA 255-270 2-1 1-1 0-1 6- 0

Playoff: Tech 285-330 2-2 2-0 5-0 1- 1

Playoff: USC B (Tom) 315-285 3-0 3-0 3- 1 1-0

Playoff: UNC 260-250 1-2 3-0 0-0 5- 1

TOTALS 4815-2540 23.929 ppg 25.000 ppg 20.769 ppg 37.857 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Matt C.	Dave H.	Vishnu J.	Arthur F.
Wake Forest II	480-5	4-0	3-1	2-0	7- 0
Tech A	320-305	3-2	2-1	2-0	3- 0
Berry	380-115	3-0	3-0	1-1	6-0
South Carolina A	420-140	2-0	4-0	3- 1	5-0
UVA	265-335	3-0	2-0	2-0	1-0
Duke	300-135	1-1	3-1	3-0	3-0
Oglethorpe	315-30	3-1	3-1	3-1	4- 1
Memphis B	450-15	6-0	5-0	N/A	4- 1
Vanderbilt	445-115	2-1	1-1	3-1	8- 0
Playoff: Emory	325-210	4-1	3-0	3- 0	1-0
Playoff: UVA	255-270	2-1	1-1	0-1	6- 0
Playoff: Tech	285-330	2-2	2-0	5-0	1- 1
Playoff: USC B (Tom)	315-285	3-0	3-0	3- 1	1-0
Playoff: UNC	260-250	1-2	3-0	0-0	5- 1
TOTALS	4815-2540	23.929 ppg	25.000 ppg	20.769 ppg	37.857 ppg

Penn Bowl VI: Monochromatic is Out

Maryland A

The All-Dave team was resurrected for Penn Bowl, with "Dave-o-rama" Vacca, "Davarino" Goodman, "Davinator" Hamilton, and the honorary "Davemeister" Arthur Fleming taking the place of Adam "Dave" Fine. Despite a first-round loss to Duke (the only team to resist assimilation), our first team reached the finals, before losing to Michigan Borg.

Opponent Team Score Davemeister Davinator Davarino Dave-o- rama

Duke 265-280 3-0 1-1 4-2 3-1

BU Succubus 535-70 1-0 6-2 7-0 3- 0

JHU B 435-55 5-0 3-1 2-3 8-1

Loyola Grey 435-125 1-1 5-1 4-1 5- 1

Chicago A 355-215 3-1 1-0 3-0 6- 1

Michigan Borg 160-285 2-2 0-1 4- 1 1-0

BGSU B 540-15 2-0 7-0 4-3 5- 1

BU 440-65 6-1 3-2 5-1 0-0

Emory 345-185 3-1 4-1 4-1 4-0

VA Tech 520-130 4-0 3-0 8-0 2- 0

Princeton Ed 365-85 4-0 1-0 5-1 5- 1

Yale 240-125 5-1 1-2 3-2 3-0

Pitt A 485-95 6-0 2-0 6-1 3-1

Minnesota B 510-65 5-0 3-0 8-0 3- 0

Ohio State 270-205 6-1 0-0 3-1 3- 0

Swarthmore A 430-300 6-0 3-0 2-0 5- 0

Playoff: Cornell A 430-260 5-0 2-1 5- 3 3-0

Playoff: Harvard Herc 355-210 3-1 3-1 2- 0 5-0

Final: Michigan Borg 280-400 3-1 0-1 5- 0 3-2

TOTALS 7395-3170 35.789 ppg 21.579 ppg 38.947 ppg 34.474 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Davemeister	Davinator	Davarino	Dave-o- rama
Duke	265-280	3-0	1-1	4-2	3-1
BU Succubus	535-70	1-0	6-2	7-0	3- 0
JHU B	435-55	5-0	3-1	2-3	8-1
Loyola Grey	435-125	1-1	5-1	4-1	5- 1
Chicago A	355-215	3-1	1-0	3-0	6- 1
Michigan Borg	160-285	2-2	0-1	4- 1	1-0
BGSU B	540-15	2-0	7-0	4-3	5- 1
BU	440-65	6-1	3-2	5-1	0-0
Emory	345-185	3-1	4-1	4-1	4-0
VA Tech	520-130	4-0	3-0	8-0	2- 0
Princeton Ed	365-85	4-0	1-0	5-1	5- 1
Yale	240-125	5-1	1-2	3-2	3-0
Pitt A	485-95	6-0	2-0	6-1	3-1
Minnesota B	510-65	5-0	3-0	8-0	3- 0
Ohio State	270-205	6-1	0-0	3-1	3- 0
Swarthmore A	430-300	6-0	3-0	2-0	5- 0
Playoff: Cornell A	430-260	5-0	2-1	5- 3	3-0
Playoff: Harvard Herc	355-210	3-1	3-1	2- 0	5-0
Final: Michigan Borg	280-400	3-1	0-1	5- 0	3-2
TOTALS	7395-3170	35.789 ppg	21.579 ppg	38.947 ppg	34.474 ppg

Maryland B

Opponent Team Score Adam F. Rob H. Matt C. Khon L./Zeke B.

Auburn-Montgomery 265-140 3-0 3-1 5- 3 0-0

BU 305-215 3-0 2-1 6-1 2-1

Swarthmore A 115-420 3-1 2-1 2-2 0- 0

Loyola Green 485-35 4-0 4-0 10-1 1- 0

Cornell B 215-125 2-0 1-0 7-2 0- 0

Michigan Talasif 185-300 2-0 1-2 5- 2 1-0

BGSU A 260-140 3-0 2-0 7-1 0- 0

Delaware A 145-225 1-0 0-1 5-2 1- 0

Virginia A 90-390 3-0 1-0 2-3 0- 0

Methodist 235-320 2-0 2-2 5-2 1- 0

Princeton Alice 235-100 4-0 2-1 4- 1 0-0

Harvard Hercules 210-280 1-1 2-0 3- 1 1-0

Penn State 240-280 3-0 3-0 3-0 0- 0

Iowa State 260-305 2-0 3-0 4-2 2- 0

Illinois 230-215 2-2 2-0 5-2 1- 0

TOTALS 3475-3490 24.000 ppg 17.000 ppg 40.000 ppg 6.333 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Adam F.	Rob H.	Matt C.	Khon L./Zeke B.
Auburn-Montgomery	265-140	3-0	3-1	5- 3	0-0
BU	305-215	3-0	2-1	6-1	2-1
Swarthmore A	115-420	3-1	2-1	2-2	0- 0
Loyola Green	485-35	4-0	4-0	10-1	1- 0
Cornell B	215-125	2-0	1-0	7-2	0- 0
Michigan Talasif	185-300	2-0	1-2	5- 2	1-0
BGSU A	260-140	3-0	2-0	7-1	0- 0
Delaware A	145-225	1-0	0-1	5-2	1- 0
Virginia A	90-390	3-0	1-0	2-3	0- 0
Methodist	235-320	2-0	2-2	5-2	1- 0
Princeton Alice	235-100	4-0	2-1	4- 1	0-0
Harvard Hercules	210-280	1-1	2-0	3- 1	1-0
Penn State	240-280	3-0	3-0	3-0	0- 0
Iowa State	260-305	2-0	3-0	4-2	2- 0
Illinois	230-215	2-2	2-0	5-2	1- 0
TOTALS	3475-3490	24.000 ppg	17.000 ppg	40.000 ppg	6.333 ppg

GWU Juan Carlos Viscerra Memorial Tournament

Doogie Howser, MD (Maryland A)

Due to an unfortunate tiebreaking system, Doogie Howser placed third at GW's tournament, despite earning more total points than the winner, Trapper John, MD, and the second place team, Penn A. The all-Dave team was resurrected once again, making its third appearance this year.

Opponent Team Score Arthur F. Dave H. Dave G. Dave V.

PSU A 350-70 4-0 3-1 6-0 1-1

Georgetown B 450-105 4-0 4-0 4-1 4- 1

Thomas Jefferson HS 435-0 4-1 2-0 8- 1 1-1

Delaware A 330-90 5-0 2-0 3-0 3- 1

Rex Morgan, MD 375-75 2-1 3-1 5- 2 4-0

Penn B 400-80 1-0 3-0 8-0 2-1

Georgetown 265-80 4-1 2-1 3-1 3- 1

Michigan 305-20 3-1 3-0 7-1 1- 0

PSU B 295-80 4-2 3-2 3-1 2-0

Leopold and Loeb 390-155 2-0 4-0 6- 1 2-0

Swarthmore 515-105 6-0 2-0 7-0 3- 1

BGSU 165-145 3-1 2-2 1-2 2-1

Trapper John, MD 285-90 1-0 3-0 2- 0 4-1

Penn A 130-210 0-0 3-1 1-2 3- 1

Marcus Welby, MD 420-0 4-0 3-0 6- 0 5-2

Virginia 135-255 3-1 0-1 0-0 3- 2

TOTALS 5245-1560 28.750 ppg 23.438 ppg 40.000 ppg 22.500 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Arthur F.	Dave H.	Dave G.	Dave V.
PSU A	350-70	4-0	3-1	6-0	1-1
Georgetown B	450-105	4-0	4-0	4-1	4- 1
Thomas Jefferson HS	435-0	4-1	2-0	8- 1	1-1
Delaware A	330-90	5-0	2-0	3-0	3- 1
Rex Morgan, MD	375-75	2-1	3-1	5- 2	4-0
Penn B	400-80	1-0	3-0	8-0	2-1
Georgetown	265-80	4-1	2-1	3-1	3- 1
Michigan	305-20	3-1	3-0	7-1	1- 0
PSU B	295-80	4-2	3-2	3-1	2-0
Leopold and Loeb	390-155	2-0	4-0	6- 1	2-0
Swarthmore	515-105	6-0	2-0	7-0	3- 1
BGSU	165-145	3-1	2-2	1-2	2-1
Trapper John, MD	285-90	1-0	3-0	2- 0	4-1
Penn A	130-210	0-0	3-1	1-2	3- 1
Marcus Welby, MD	420-0	4-0	3-0	6- 0	5-2
Virginia	135-255	3-1	0-1	0-0	3- 2
TOTALS	5245-1560	28.750 ppg	23.438 ppg	40.000 ppg	22.500 ppg

Trapper John, MD (Maryland B)

This team proved that even the most hardcore ACF'ers can revert to playing on CBI-like questions, as a team with Matt Colvin, Vishnu Jejjala, and Adam Fine won the JCV along with trashmaster Rob Hershey.

Opponent Team Score Matt C. Adam F. Rob H. Vishnu J.

Swarthmore 325-130 4-3 3-0 2-1 3- 0

Marcus Welby, MD 335-60 4-3 4-1 2- 0 6-0

Virginia 246-215 3-0 1-0 1-0 4- 0

Penn XXX 280-260 4-0 1-0 1-0 5- 0

Bowling Green 300-65 7-2 2-0 1-0 1- 0

Penn State 325-105 5-3 2-0 2-0 6- 0

Georgetown B 145-165 2-1 0-0 1-0 5- 2

Thomas Jefferson HS 150-135 6-1 1-0 1- 1 0-1

Delaware 185-110 4-2 1-0 1-1 4- 0

Rex Morgan, MD 320-50 6-1 0-0 1- 1 5-1

Penn B 365-120 5-1 4-0 1-0 2- 0

Leopold and Loeb 220-150 5-0 1-0 1- 0 3-0

Doogie Howser, MD 95-285 3-2 1-0 1- 0 1-0

Penn State B 320-105 8-0 1-0 0-0 7- 2

Georgetown A 200-160 4-1 2-1 1-0 3- 0

Michigan 305-70 5-1 3-0 0-0 3- 1

TOTALS 4116-2185 40.313 ppg 16.250 ppg 9.375 ppg 34.063 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Matt C.	Adam F.	Rob H.	Vishnu J.
Swarthmore	325-130	4-3	3-0	2-1	3- 0
Marcus Welby, MD	335-60	4-3	4-1	2- 0	6-0
Virginia	246-215	3-0	1-0	1-0	4- 0
Penn XXX	280-260	4-0	1-0	1-0	5- 0
Bowling Green	300-65	7-2	2-0	1-0	1- 0
Penn State	325-105	5-3	2-0	2-0	6- 0
Georgetown B	145-165	2-1	0-0	1-0	5- 2
Thomas Jefferson HS	150-135	6-1	1-0	1- 1	0-1
Delaware	185-110	4-2	1-0	1-1	4- 0
Rex Morgan, MD	320-50	6-1	0-0	1- 1	5-1
Penn B	365-120	5-1	4-0	1-0	2- 0
Leopold and Loeb	220-150	5-0	1-0	1- 0	3-0
Doogie Howser, MD	95-285	3-2	1-0	1- 0	1-0
Penn State B	320-105	8-0	1-0	0-0	7- 2
Georgetown A	200-160	4-1	2-1	1-0	3- 0
Michigan	305-70	5-1	3-0	0-0	3- 1
TOTALS	4116-2185	40.313 ppg	16.250 ppg	9.375 ppg	34.063 ppg

Marcus Welby, MD (Maryland C)

Our C team played well and won a close game against Michigan. They also beat Maryland's fourth team, Rex Morgan, MD, for which no stats are available.

Opponent Team Score Curtis L. Zeke B. Jason D. Khon L.

BGSU 70-185 0-0 0-0 1-0 1-0

Trapper John, MD 60-335 1-0 2-0 0- 0 1-0

PSU A 105-280 1-0 1-1 1-0 1-0

Georgetown B 60-170 1-0 2-1 0-0 0- 0

Thomas Jefferson HS 45-200 0-0 0-0 3- 1 0-0

Delaware 50-160 0-0 1-0 2-0 0- 0

Rex Morgan, MD 145-30 6-0 2-1 0- 0 1-0

Penn B 55-125 3-0 0-0 0-0 1-0

Georgetown A 95-130 1-1 3-0 0-0 1- 0

Michigan 75-70 2-0 1-0 0-1 1- 0

PSU B 15-230 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-0

Leopold and Loeb 40-395 0-0 1-0 1- 0 0-0

Virginia 55-230 0-0 3-0 1-0 1- 0

Penn A 90-235 1-1 4-0 1-0 1-0

Doogie Howser, MD 0-430 0-0 0-0 0- 0 0-0

Swarthmore 70-325 0-0 2-0 0-0 1- 0

TOTALS 1030-3530 9.375 ppg 13.438 ppg 5.625 ppg 6.250 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Curtis L.	Zeke B.	Jason D.	Khon L.
BGSU	70-185	0-0	0-0	1-0	1-0
Trapper John, MD	60-335	1-0	2-0	0- 0	1-0
PSU A	105-280	1-0	1-1	1-0	1-0
Georgetown B	60-170	1-0	2-1	0-0	0- 0
Thomas Jefferson HS	45-200	0-0	0-0	3- 1	0-0
Delaware	50-160	0-0	1-0	2-0	0- 0
Rex Morgan, MD	145-30	6-0	2-1	0- 0	1-0
Penn B	55-125	3-0	0-0	0-0	1-0
Georgetown A	95-130	1-1	3-0	0-0	1- 0
Michigan	75-70	2-0	1-0	0-1	1- 0
PSU B	15-230	0-0	1-0	0-0	0-0
Leopold and Loeb	40-395	0-0	1-0	1- 0	0-0
Virginia	55-230	0-0	3-0	1-0	1- 0
Penn A	90-235	1-1	4-0	1-0	1-0
Doogie Howser, MD	0-430	0-0	0-0	0- 0	0-0
Swarthmore	70-325	0-0	2-0	0-0	1- 0
TOTALS	1030-3530	9.375 ppg	13.438 ppg	5.625 ppg	6.250 ppg

Tennessee Invitational

We placed second at this tournament, dropping a close game to Georgia Tech.

Opponent Team Score Matt C. Dave H. Dave G. Arthur F.

Michigan 350-240 6-1 2-1 1-1 2- 0

Tech II 555-35 1-0 7-0 4-0 5-0

Tech III 510-15 5-0 3-0 4-2 4-0

Tennessee 370-155 5-1 1-0 3-1 3- 0

South Alabama 315-35 3-1 2-2 6-1 0- 0

Lee 635-10 3-0 7-0 6-1 1-0

Memphis I 455-105 3-0 3-1 6-0 3- 0

Tennessee II 385-115 3-0 3-0 3-0 4- 2

Memphis II 340-45 3-1 8-0 1-0 1- 0

Tech I 210-345 2-0 1-0 2-1 2-1

Berry 410-55 3-2 3-0 4-1 3-0

TOTALS 4535-1155 30.901 ppg 34.545 ppg 32.727 ppg 24.091 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Matt C.	Dave H.	Dave G.	Arthur F.
Michigan	350-240	6-1	2-1	1-1	2- 0
Tech II	555-35	1-0	7-0	4-0	5-0
Tech III	510-15	5-0	3-0	4-2	4-0
Tennessee	370-155	5-1	1-0	3-1	3- 0
South Alabama	315-35	3-1	2-2	6-1	0- 0
Lee	635-10	3-0	7-0	6-1	1-0
Memphis I	455-105	3-0	3-1	6-0	3- 0
Tennessee II	385-115	3-0	3-0	3-0	4- 2
Memphis II	340-45	3-1	8-0	1-0	1- 0
Tech I	210-345	2-0	1-0	2-1	2-1
Berry	410-55	3-2	3-0	4-1	3-0
TOTALS	4535-1155	30.901 ppg	34.545 ppg	32.727 ppg	24.091 ppg

Georgtown Cup III

Sea Dogs

Despite being the better team in theory, Arthur, Matt, Vishnu, and Dave Vacca were edged in two last-question losses, to the Edwards/Yaphe team and to Maryland Spinoza's Dog, leaving the Sea Dogs with a 3rd place finish. More proof that the Curse never sleeps.

Opponent Team Score Arthur F. Vishnu J. Matt C. Dave V.

Michigan Hardy 390-120 1-1 3-1 5- 0 6-0

MD Hound Dogs 520-15 2-0 2-1 7- 1 6-1

Columbia 440-90 5-1 1-0 3-1 6- 1

NYU A 315-80 5-0 3-0 2-1 5-2

NYU B 490-145 1-0 4-1 6-2 6- 0

GW Sea Dogs 375-190 5-0 2-0 4-1 2- 0

Edwards/Yaphe 300-315 5-0 2-0 1- 0 3-2

Randolph-Macon 345-120 6-0 3-0 3- 0 2-1

GW G.L.O.T. 310-50 3-0 3-1 2-0 6- 0

Michigan Laurel 430-140 2-0 3-0 1- 0 8-0

GW Stallions 430-200 6-0 2-0 1-1 6- 0

MD Spinoza's Dog 310-320 3-0 2-0 2- 0 3-2

MD Reservoir Dogs 455-50 4-0 2-1 7- 0 5-0

JHU 385-240 5-0 3-1 3-0 3-0

TOTALS 5510-2060 37.143 ppg 23.571 ppg 36.071 ppg 44.643 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Arthur F.	Vishnu J.	Matt C.	Dave V.
Michigan Hardy	390-120	1-1	3-1	5- 0	6-0
MD Hound Dogs	520-15	2-0	2-1	7- 1	6-1
Columbia	440-90	5-1	1-0	3-1	6- 1
NYU A	315-80	5-0	3-0	2-1	5-2
NYU B	490-145	1-0	4-1	6-2	6- 0
GW Sea Dogs	375-190	5-0	2-0	4-1	2- 0
Edwards/Yaphe	300-315	5-0	2-0	1- 0	3-2
Randolph-Macon	345-120	6-0	3-0	3- 0	2-1
GW G.L.O.T.	310-50	3-0	3-1	2-0	6- 0
Michigan Laurel	430-140	2-0	3-0	1- 0	8-0
GW Stallions	430-200	6-0	2-0	1-1	6- 0
MD Spinoza's Dog	310-320	3-0	2-0	2- 0	3-2
MD Reservoir Dogs	455-50	4-0	2-1	7- 0	5-0
JHU	385-240	5-0	3-1	3-0	3-0
TOTALS	5510-2060	37.143 ppg	23.571 ppg	36.071 ppg	44.643 ppg

Spinoza's Dog

Unable to get down to Emory to play in the Juniorbird, the all-sophomore team of Dave Hamilton, Dave Goodman, Adam Fine, and Zeke Berdichevsky instead went undefeated at Georgetown Cup III, beating the putative A team, Maryland Sea Dogs, en route to Maryland's second 1-3 finish and 5th tournament win of the season.

Opponent Team Score Zeke B. Adam F. Dave H. Dave G.

NYU B 520-20 0-0 4-0 5-2 8-0

GW Sea Dogs 475-120 0-1 2-0 9-2 4- 0

Edwards/Yaphe 345-285 1-0 0-0 7- 0 4-0

Randolph-Macon 315-115 2-2 3-0 7- 1 0-0

GW G.L.O.T. 355-65 2-0 3-1 2-1 8- 0

Michigan Laurel 440-150 2-0 4-0 5- 1 3-1

GW Stallions 245-180 2-0 0-0 2-0 7- 0

MD Reservoir Dogs 295-60 0-0 2-0 8- 0 3-1

JHU 255-130 0-0 2-0 7-1 3-1

Michigan Hardy 310-105 3-0 5-0 4- 1 3-0

MD Hound Dogs 335-90 0-0 4-0 6- 0 6-3

MD Sea Dogs 320-310 0-0 0-1 5-1 5- 1

Columbia 365-25 1-0 3-0 3-0 9- 0

NYU A 340-185 0-0 5-1 4-1 4- 1

TOTALS 4915-1840 8.214 ppg 25.357 ppg 48.929 ppg 45.000 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Zeke B.	Adam F.	Dave H.	Dave G.
NYU B	520-20	0-0	4-0	5-2	8-0
GW Sea Dogs	475-120	0-1	2-0	9-2	4- 0
Edwards/Yaphe	345-285	1-0	0-0	7- 0	4-0
Randolph-Macon	315-115	2-2	3-0	7- 1	0-0
GW G.L.O.T.	355-65	2-0	3-1	2-1	8- 0
Michigan Laurel	440-150	2-0	4-0	5- 1	3-1
GW Stallions	245-180	2-0	0-0	2-0	7- 0
MD Reservoir Dogs	295-60	0-0	2-0	8- 0	3-1
JHU	255-130	0-0	2-0	7-1	3-1
Michigan Hardy	310-105	3-0	5-0	4- 1	3-0
MD Hound Dogs	335-90	0-0	4-0	6- 0	6-3
MD Sea Dogs	320-310	0-0	0-1	5-1	5- 1
Columbia	365-25	1-0	3-0	3-0	9- 0
NYU A	340-185	0-0	5-1	4-1	4- 1
TOTALS	4915-1840	8.214 ppg	25.357 ppg	48.929 ppg	45.000 ppg

Reservoir Dogs

Opponent	Team Score	Michelle C.	Rob H.	Curtis L.	Jason D.
NYU A	100-235	2-1	3-3	0- 0	N/A
NYU B	225-150	3-0	5-1	1-0	0- 0
GW Sea Dogs	30-390	0-0	2-1	0-0	0- 0
Edwards/Yaphe	65-365	0-2	2-1	0-0	2- 0
Randolph-Macon	45-195	1-0	3-3	0- 0	0-1
GW G.L.O.T.	185-260	1-1	7-2	0-0	0- 0
Michigan Laurel	80-390	0-0	2-0	1- 0	0-0
GW Stallions	145-250	2-0	4-0	0-1	1- 0
MD Spinozas Dog	60-295	1-0	1-0	1- 0	0-0
JHU	245-280	4-0	1-2	4-0	0-0
Michigan Hardy	235-165	2-1	4-1	0- 0	3-0
MD Hound Dogs	260-110	4-1	6-1	1- 0	1-0
MD Sea Dogs	50-460	0-0	1-0	1-0	1- 0
Columbia	195-280	2-0	4-0	1-0	2- 1
TOTALS	1920-3825	13.571 ppg	26.786 ppg	6.786 ppg	6.923 ppg

Hound Dogs

Opponent	Team Score	Lisa	Khon L.	Rachel
MD Sea Dogs	15-520	0-0	1-0	0-1
Columbia	40-225	0-0	0-0	3-0
NYU A	25-235	1-1	2-0	0-0
NYU B	25-150	0-0	0-0	2-0
GW Sea Dogs	0-440	0-0	0-0	0-0
Edwards/Yaphe	45-455	0-0	2-0	1-0
Randolph-Macon	30-180	1-0	0-0	1-0
GW G.L.O.T.	35-280	0-0	1-0	0-0
Michigan Laurel	115-190	1-0	2-0	5-1
GW Stallions	25-370	0-0	0-0	1-1
MD Spinozas Dog	90-335	1-0	1-0	4-0
MD Reservoir Dogs	110-295	0-0	1-0	4-0
JHU	50-315	2-0	0-0	0-0
Michigan Hardy	50-465	0-0	0-0	3-2
TOTALS	655-4185	3.929 ppg	7.143 ppg	15.714 ppg

ACF Mid-Atlantic Regionals

Maryland A

Maryland A barely lost to Virginia by 5 points in their first encounter, but won the rematch game, stunning Virginia in the first half 270 to 25, and withstanding the inevitable second half comeback miracle to win 305-200. Two ugly protests sullied the first game, but the win in the second allowed us to claim first place on total points and differential, for our 6th tournament victory of 1995-6. Replacing Dave Goodman for this tournament as official biscuit of the MAQT was Arthur Fleming, whose -5 prevented us from answering all 20 tossups against our C team. Oh well, maybe next year.

Opponent Team Score Matt C. Dave H. Dave V. Arthur F.

PSU 385-35 1-0 4-1 1-1 7-0

JHU 365-150 0-1 2-0 2-0 8-1

UVA 220-225 1-2 2-1 2-1 3-0

MD C 490-35 6-0 5-2 2-0 4-0

GWU A 455-85 4-0 3-1 2-2 5- 0

GWU B 415-175 5-0 1-1 1-0 5- 1

MD B 445-120 5-1 2-1 1-0 6-0

Delaware 390-80 7-0 2-2 2-0 2- 1

MD B 500-75 4-0 4-0 5-1 3-0

MD C 620-0 5-0 5-0 4-0 5-1

Delaware 450-115 4-0 3-1 2-0 5- 0

JHU 365-125 5-3 4-1 1-0 4-1

GWU B 445-95 4-1 5-0 4-0 2-0

GWU A 440-70 3-0 5-1 2-1 4- 0

PSU 555-(-5) 3-0 3-0 6-3 5-0

UVA 305-200 2-2 3-1 0-0 4-0

TOTALS 6845-1580 33.750 ppg 30.000 ppg 20.313 ppg 43.438 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Matt C.	Dave H.	Dave V.	Arthur F.
PSU	385-35	1-0	4-1	1-1	7-0
JHU	365-150	0-1	2-0	2-0	8-1
UVA	220-225	1-2	2-1	2-1	3-0
MD C	490-35	6-0	5-2	2-0	4-0
GWU A	455-85	4-0	3-1	2-2	5- 0
GWU B	415-175	5-0	1-1	1-0	5- 1
MD B	445-120	5-1	2-1	1-0	6-0
Delaware	390-80	7-0	2-2	2-0	2- 1
MD B	500-75	4-0	4-0	5-1	3-0
MD C	620-0	5-0	5-0	4-0	5-1
Delaware	450-115	4-0	3-1	2-0	5- 0
JHU	365-125	5-3	4-1	1-0	4-1
GWU B	445-95	4-1	5-0	4-0	2-0
GWU A	440-70	3-0	5-1	2-1	4- 0
PSU	555-(-5)	3-0	3-0	6-3	5-0
UVA	305-200	2-2	3-1	0-0	4-0
TOTALS	6845-1580	33.750 ppg	30.000 ppg	20.313 ppg	43.438 ppg

Maryland B

Opponent	Team Score	Adam F.	Zeke B.	Curtis L.	Michelle C.
GWU B	160-255	3-0	0-0	3-0	0- 0
Delaware	210-115	7-0	1-0	0-0	1- 0
PSU	160-65	4-1	0-1	0-0	2-1
UVA	120-420	2-0	2-0	1-0	0-0
JHU	205-340	3-0	3-0	0-0	1-0
GWU A	120-260	6-2	0-0	0-0	0- 0
MD A	120-445	3-0	0-0	2-0	0-0
MD C	205-45	7-0	2-1	1-1	1-0
UVA	115-455	3-2	2-0	0-0	0-0
MD A	75-500	2-0	1-1	0-0	1-0
MD C	235-40	6-1	2-0	0-0	2-0
Delaware	95-225	6-2	0-0	0-0	0- 0
GWU A	95-275	4-2	0-0	1-0	0- 0
JHU	60-415	1-2	1-1	1-0	0-0
GWU B	180-190	5-1	0-1	1-0	0- 1
PSU	110-65	5-2	1-1	0-0	0-0
TOTALS	2265-4110	37.188 ppg	7.500 ppg	5.938 ppg	4.375 ppg

Maryland C

Opponent	Team Score	Khon	Dave Z.	Ricky	Player 4
GWU A	20-270	0-0	2-0	0-0	0- 0
GWU B	30-285	0-0	0-0	1-0	1-0
MD A	35-490	1-0	1-0	0-0	0-0
PSU	35-185	1-1	1-0	0-0	1-0
Delaware	70-215	0-0	0-0	1-0	2- 0
JHU	50-530	0-0	1-0	0-0	1-0
UVA	0-505	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0
MD B	45-205	0-0	1-0	0-0	2-1
PSU	50-200	1-0	0-0	1-0	N/A
UVA	20-420	0-0	1-0	0-0	N/A
MD A	0-620	0-0	0-0	0-0	N/A
MD B	40-235	1-0	1-0	2-0	N/A
JHU	50-435	2-0	N/A	0-0	0-0
Delaware	190-145	1-0	N/A	0-1	7- 1
GWU A	10-230	1-0	N/A	0-0	0- 0
GWU B	0-345	0-0	N/A	0- 0	N/A
TOTALS	645-5315	4.688 ppg	6.667 ppg	2.813 ppg	See below

Player 4 stats:
Jason went 5-0 in 6 games for 8.333 ppg.
Diamond went 0-1 in 3 games for -1.667 ppg.
Laura went 2-1 in 2 games for 7.5 ppg.
Rob went 7-0 in one game for 70 ppg.

Wahoo War of the Minds

Maryland A

Our first team went to the playoffs undefeated after winning a tie-breaker with Georgia Tech A. We advanced to the finals, but lost a close game to Tom Waters and the South Carolina team.

Opponent Team Score Matt C. David H. Dave G. Arthur F.

Methodist 355-120 3-1 2-1 4-0 3- 1

VA Tech A 385-135 0-1 5-2 4-0 3- 0

GA Tech A 230-220 3-2 1-1 4-0 2- 0

GWU A 290-115 1-1 2-1 3-1 5- 0

Emory A 415-45 5-0 5-1 3-0 1- 0

NCSU B 440-60 1-1 5-2 7-0 3- 0

Roanoke 260-115 1-1 2-0 4-1 3- 0

PSU 510-(-5) 1-1 5-0 5-2 6-0

Georgia 355-5 5-0 0-0 3-1 5-0

Longwood B 265-45 2-0 6-1 4-1 2- 0

Penn 380-30 6-0 1-1 4-1 3-0

Loyola B 230-25 1-1 4-1 2-2 3- 1

Randolph-Macon 315-40 1-0 2-0 5- 0 4-0

Playoffs: Emory B 420-90 2-1 4-1 3- 1 5-0

Roanoke 345-135 3-1 5-0 1-1 2- 0

GWU B 440-40 5-1 2-0 5-0 4-0

Final: USC 185-210 3-1 2-0 1-1 2- 2

TOTALS 5820-1425 21.470 ppg 27.058 ppg 32.941 ppg 31.765 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Matt C.	David H.	Dave G.	Arthur F.
Methodist	355-120	3-1	2-1	4-0	3- 1
VA Tech A	385-135	0-1	5-2	4-0	3- 0
GA Tech A	230-220	3-2	1-1	4-0	2- 0
GWU A	290-115	1-1	2-1	3-1	5- 0
Emory A	415-45	5-0	5-1	3-0	1- 0
NCSU B	440-60	1-1	5-2	7-0	3- 0
Roanoke	260-115	1-1	2-0	4-1	3- 0
PSU	510-(-5)	1-1	5-0	5-2	6-0
Georgia	355-5	5-0	0-0	3-1	5-0
Longwood B	265-45	2-0	6-1	4-1	2- 0
Penn	380-30	6-0	1-1	4-1	3-0
Loyola B	230-25	1-1	4-1	2-2	3- 1
Randolph-Macon	315-40	1-0	2-0	5- 0	4-0
Playoffs: Emory B	420-90	2-1	4-1	3- 1	5-0
Roanoke	345-135	3-1	5-0	1-1	2- 0
GWU B	440-40	5-1	2-0	5-0	4-0
Final: USC	185-210	3-1	2-0	1-1	2- 2
TOTALS	5820-1425	21.470 ppg	27.058 ppg	32.941 ppg	31.765 ppg

Maryland B

Our second team played well and made it to the playoffs with a 6-6 record. They made it to the round of 8 by beating GWU A, but lost to GWU B, whom Maryland A beat in the semifinals.

Opponent Team Score Khon Zeke Ricky Laura Dave V. Rob

Duke 80-335 0-0 3-0 1-0 1- 0 N/A N/A

Va Tech B 150-50 2-0 6-0 0-1 1- 0 N/A N/A

GA Tech B 0-395 0-0 0-0 0-0 0- 0 N/A N/A

GWU B 90-175 2-0 3-0 1-0 0- 0 N/A N/A

Emory B 55-175 0-0 2-0 1-0 0- 0 N/A N/A

NC State A 210-145 N/A 2-0 0- 0 N/A 6-2 N/A

USC 45-385 0-0 N/A 1-0 0- 0 N/A 2-1

Harvard 265-130 N/A 0-0 0- 0 N/A 9-1 3-0

Bridgewater 100-40 1-0 1- 0 N/A N/A 3-1 0-1

Longwood A 200-25 0-0 N/A N/A 2- 0 7-1 1-0

GA Tech C 5-135 0-0 0-0 1-1 0- 0 N/A N/A

Loyola A 225-25 2-0 N/A 0-0 1- 0 8-0 N/A

Team Edwards 125-170 N/A 2- 0 N/A 0-0 2-1 1-0

Playoffs: GWU A 215-140 0-0 1- 0 N/A N/A 6-0 4-1

GWU B 110-285 0-0 1- 0 N/A N/A 3-1 1-0

TOTALS 1875-2610 6.364 ppg 19.091 ppg 3.889 ppg 5.556 ppg 50.625 ppg 15.625 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Khon	Zeke	Ricky	Laura	Dave V.	Rob
Duke	80-335	0-0	3-0	1-0	1- 0	N/A	N/A
Va Tech B	150-50	2-0	6-0	0-1	1- 0	N/A	N/A
GA Tech B	0-395	0-0	0-0	0-0	0- 0	N/A	N/A
GWU B	90-175	2-0	3-0	1-0	0- 0	N/A	N/A
Emory B	55-175	0-0	2-0	1-0	0- 0	N/A	N/A
NC State A	210-145	N/A	2-0	0- 0	N/A	6-2	N/A
USC	45-385	0-0	N/A	1-0	0- 0	N/A	2-1
Harvard	265-130	N/A	0-0	0- 0	N/A	9-1	3-0
Bridgewater	100-40	1-0	1- 0	N/A	N/A	3-1	0-1
Longwood A	200-25	0-0	N/A	N/A	2- 0	7-1	1-0
GA Tech C	5-135	0-0	0-0	1-1	0- 0	N/A	N/A
Loyola A	225-25	2-0	N/A	0-0	1- 0	8-0	N/A
Team Edwards	125-170	N/A	2- 0	N/A	0-0	2-1	1-0
Playoffs: GWU A	215-140	0-0	1- 0	N/A	N/A	6-0	4-1
GWU B	110-285	0-0	1- 0	N/A	N/A	3-1	1-0
TOTALS	1875-2610	6.364 ppg	19.091 ppg	3.889 ppg	5.556 ppg	50.625 ppg	15.625 ppg

Swarthmore Questions on the Crum

Maryland A

Both teams struggled with trash-heavy packets, but the first team ran through its preliminary bracket, dropping one game to Penn State and beating the masters team of 100 Years of Scholitude. They stormed their way to the final, only to lose to MIT on a protest trumped up by MIT's coach, Jim Bales. The protest involved a question on which MIT inexplicably rang in and gave an incorrect answer, even though the question was later deemed by Pat Friel to have no answer at all.

Opponent Team Score Arthur F. Dave G. Dave H. Dave V.

BU 405-110 3-0 6-1 3-0 4-0

100 Years of Scholitude 245-235 3-0 0-1 3- 0 3-2

Princeton 365-85 4-0 2-0 5-1 3- 0

Loyola 505-65 3-0 7-1 1-1 7-1

PSU 150-230 1-0 4-1 1-1 2-2

Yale 405-95 3-2 4-2 6-0 3-0

Penn 355-145 2-0 4-1 4-0 3-3

Harvard 255-230 3-0 5-1 1-1 2- 0

Cornell Ebola 375-135 1-0 8-1 2-0 3- 2

Penn 220-145 5-1 2-1 4-1 2-1

Playoffs: Cornell Mad Cow 435-85 2-0 3-3 6- 0 4-0

Finger Princeton 345-200 4-1 6-0 1- 2 2-0

Final: MIT and Jim Bales 215-220 4-2 1-3 2- 0 2-1

TOTALS 4275-1980 26.923 ppg 33.846 ppg 27.308 ppg 26.154 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Arthur F.	Dave G.	Dave H.	Dave V.
BU	405-110	3-0	6-1	3-0	4-0
100 Years of Scholitude	245-235	3-0	0-1	3- 0	3-2
Princeton	365-85	4-0	2-0	5-1	3- 0
Loyola	505-65	3-0	7-1	1-1	7-1
PSU	150-230	1-0	4-1	1-1	2-2
Yale	405-95	3-2	4-2	6-0	3-0
Penn	355-145	2-0	4-1	4-0	3-3
Harvard	255-230	3-0	5-1	1-1	2- 0
Cornell Ebola	375-135	1-0	8-1	2-0	3- 2
Penn	220-145	5-1	2-1	4-1	2-1
Playoffs: Cornell Mad Cow	435-85	2-0	3-3	6- 0	4-0
Finger Princeton	345-200	4-1	6-0	1- 2	2-0
Final: MIT and Jim Bales	215-220	4-2	1-3	2- 0	2-1
TOTALS	4275-1980	26.923 ppg	33.846 ppg	27.308 ppg	26.154 ppg

Maryland B

The B team struggled in the other bracket, losing a last question game to Princeton and missing the playoffs by 2 games.

Opponent Team Score Matt C. Michelle C. Khon L. Curtis L.

Penn Rodin 245-55 8-2 2-1 2-0 0- 0

Edwards/Yaphe Bastards 120-305 8-3 0-0 0- 0 0-0

Hand Princeton 170-300 5-5 0-0 0- 0 1-0

Finger Princeton 220-230 7-3 2-0 1- 0 0-0

Felt Tip Penn St. 165-300 5-3 2-0 0- 0 1-0

Delaware 245-90 10-3 1-0 0-0 1- 0

Penn Mothra 350-65 15-0 0-1 0-0 0- 0

Dickinson 270-0 14-0 1-0 0-0 1- 0

Cornell A 120-240 4-4 1-0 0-0 0- 0

MIT 185-260 9-2 0-0 0-0 0-0

TOTALS 2090-1845 72.500 ppg 8.000 ppg 3.000 ppg 4.000 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Matt C.	Michelle C.	Khon L.	Curtis L.
Penn Rodin	245-55	8-2	2-1	2-0	0- 0
Edwards/Yaphe Bastards	120-305	8-3	0-0	0- 0	0-0
Hand Princeton	170-300	5-5	0-0	0- 0	1-0
Finger Princeton	220-230	7-3	2-0	1- 0	0-0
Felt Tip Penn St.	165-300	5-3	2-0	0- 0	1-0
Delaware	245-90	10-3	1-0	0-0	1- 0
Penn Mothra	350-65	15-0	0-1	0-0	0- 0
Dickinson	270-0	14-0	1-0	0-0	1- 0
Cornell A	120-240	4-4	1-0	0-0	0- 0
MIT	185-260	9-2	0-0	0-0	0-0
TOTALS	2090-1845	72.500 ppg	8.000 ppg	3.000 ppg	4.000 ppg

Hopkins Invitational

MD Deep Thought

We decided to have fun at JHU instead of winning another tournament, so we split up our top four players to see what would happen. MD Deep Space 9 and Deep Thought made it to the semifinals, and Deep Thought lost in a close final to Virginia A.

Opponent Team Score Dave Z. Dave H. Dave V. Raj

MD Deep Shit 350-90 1-0 3-1 9-0 0- 0

RMC A 260-65 1-0 7-0 3-2 0-0

UVA A 245-130 0-0 3-0 5-0 2- 0

Georgetown 245-195 1-1 7-1 2-1 0- 1

GWU A 220-120 0-0 6-1 2-0 0- 0

Loyola 385-125 0-0 10-0 3-2 0- 0

MD Deep Throat 195-245 0-0 3-0 4- 0 1-0

RMC B 550-0 0-0 12-0 4-1 0-2

UVA B 275-285 0-0 4-1 4-2 1- 0

GWU B 350-90 0-0 8-0 7-1 0-0

JMU 280-20 0-0 7-2 4-1 0-0

MD DS9 275-235 1-0 4-4 3-0 1- 0

Playoffs: MD DS9 315-120 0-0 8-0 5- 0 0-0

Final: UVA A 130-190 0-0 2-1 3-0 1- 0

TOTALS 4075-1910 2.500 ppg 56.071 ppg 37.857 ppg 3.214 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Dave Z.	Dave H.	Dave V.	Raj
MD Deep Shit	350-90	1-0	3-1	9-0	0- 0
RMC A	260-65	1-0	7-0	3-2	0-0
UVA A	245-130	0-0	3-0	5-0	2- 0
Georgetown	245-195	1-1	7-1	2-1	0- 1
GWU A	220-120	0-0	6-1	2-0	0- 0
Loyola	385-125	0-0	10-0	3-2	0- 0
MD Deep Throat	195-245	0-0	3-0	4- 0	1-0
RMC B	550-0	0-0	12-0	4-1	0-2
UVA B	275-285	0-0	4-1	4-2	1- 0
GWU B	350-90	0-0	8-0	7-1	0-0
JMU	280-20	0-0	7-2	4-1	0-0
MD DS9	275-235	1-0	4-4	3-0	1- 0
Playoffs: MD DS9	315-120	0-0	8-0	5- 0	0-0
Final: UVA A	130-190	0-0	2-1	3-0	1- 0
TOTALS	4075-1910	2.500 ppg	56.071 ppg	37.857 ppg	3.214 ppg

MD Deep Space 9

Opponent	Team Score	Adam	Vic	Curtis	Arthur
MD Throat	340-170	4-0	0-0	1-0	5- 0
RMC B	290-25	5-1	0-1	1-0	6-0
UVA B	100-295	1-1	0-1	0-0	4- 2
GWU B	290-190	4-0	0-0	0-0	7- 1
JMU	215-95	2-1	0-0	0-0	9-0
MD Deep Shit	170-165	3-0	0-0	0-0	5- 1
RMC A	360-105	3-0	0-0	1-0	9- 0
UVA A	340-250	2-0	0-0	0-0	8- 1
Georgetown	470-55	8-0	0-0	4-0	3- 0
GWU A	200-205	1-0	0-0	1-0	7- 0
Loyola	285-30	3-0	1-0	1-0	6-0
MD Thought	235-275	2-0	0-0	2-0	6- 0
Playoffs: Thought	120-315	3-0	0-0	0- 0	3-4
TOTALS	3415-2175	30.385 ppg	0 ppg	8.462 ppg	56.538 ppg

MD Deep Throat

Opponent	Score	Vishnu	Jason	Diamond	Matt
MD DS9	170-340	3-0	0-0	0-0	5- 1
MD Deep Shit	215-205	1-2	0-0	0- 0	10-0
RMC A	340-60	4-0	1-0	0-0	7-0
UVA A	115-295	1-0	0-0	0-0	4- 4
Georgetown	265-35	5-0	0-0	0-0	7- 0
GWU A	265-220	4-0	0-0	0-0	7- 0
Loyola	130-75	2-1	0-0	0-0	5-2
MD Thought	245-195	3-0	2-0	0-0	5- 2
RMC B	330-20	5-1	0-0	1-0	7-1
UVA B	135-255	2-0	1-0	0-0	4- 2
GWU B	285-65	4-1	1-0	0-0	7-1
JMU	270-10	3-0	0-0	0-0	8-4
TOTALS	2655-1775	28.750 ppg	4.167 ppg	0.833 ppg	56.667 ppg

MD Deep Shit

Opponent	Team Score	Michelle	Dave G.	Zeke	Khon
MD Thought	90-350	0-0	3-0	0-0	0- 0
MD Throat	205-215	0-0	6-0	1-0	0- 0
RMC B	295-15	2-1	7-1	2-0	0-0
UVA B	185-240	0-0	8-0	0-0	0- 0
GWU B	230-150	0-0	7-2	0-0	1- 0
JMU	250-125	1-1	10-1	1-0	0-0
MD DS9	165-170	0-0	4-1	2-0	0- 0
RMC A	305-20	0-0	12-1	0-0	0- 0
UVA A	140-340	0-0	6-1	0-0	0- 0
Georgetown	390-55	1-0	10-0	1-0	2- 0
GWU A	195-115	0-0	7-0	2-0	0- 0
Loyola	295-60	1-0	9-3	1-0	0-0
TOTALS	2745-1855	3.333 ppg	70.000 ppg	8.333 ppg	2.500 ppg

ACF Nationals

MD A

Our A team, composed of two sophomores and two juniors, lost a close game to Oklahoma, but it did not carry into the playoffs. A victory over Harvard forced a final game against GA Tech, who beat us and remained undefeated for the whole tournament.

Opponent Team Score Matt Dave H. Dave G. Arthur

Duke 370-105 2-1 6-0 4-1 1-1

Illinois A 390-135 5-0 2-1 3-1 3- 0

USC 395-145 5-2 4-0 2-1 1-0

Oklahoma 245-265 4-0 1-0 1-1 2- 1

Emory 385-120 3-1 3-1 1-0 5-0

GA Tech B 385-85 2-0 4-1 4-0 5- 0

UVA A 350-200 3-0 2-0 6-0 0- 0

Tennessee B 465-10 5-2 6-0 3-0 2- 0

Michigan B 480-55 2-0 4-1 5-0 4- 0

Harvard B 415-125 0-0 4-0 6-2 4- 0

Ohio St. 335-165 3-1 4-1 2-0 2- 0

BYU 320-70 2-1 3-1 4-2 3-0

Iowa 400-125 3-2 4-0 2-0 5-0

Cornell 415-145 1-1 1-1 4-1 7- 0

GA Tech A 205-405 1-2 1-1 2-0 3- 0

Berkeley A 310-130 4-0 2-0 2-0 4- 1

Iowa State 285-170 3-0 3-0 4-0 1- 2

Princeton 410-50 4-0 2-0 5-0 3- 0

Michigan A 340-155 2-1 3-1 3-0 4- 1

Harvard 365-245 1-1 4-0 4-0 2- 0

Final: GA Tech A 275-340 0-1 2-0 4- 0 3-0

TOTALS 7540-2905 21.429 ppg 28.810 ppg 31.667 ppg 29.048 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Matt	Dave H.	Dave G.	Arthur
Duke	370-105	2-1	6-0	4-1	1-1
Illinois A	390-135	5-0	2-1	3-1	3- 0
USC	395-145	5-2	4-0	2-1	1-0
Oklahoma	245-265	4-0	1-0	1-1	2- 1
Emory	385-120	3-1	3-1	1-0	5-0
GA Tech B	385-85	2-0	4-1	4-0	5- 0
UVA A	350-200	3-0	2-0	6-0	0- 0
Tennessee B	465-10	5-2	6-0	3-0	2- 0
Michigan B	480-55	2-0	4-1	5-0	4- 0
Harvard B	415-125	0-0	4-0	6-2	4- 0
Ohio St.	335-165	3-1	4-1	2-0	2- 0
BYU	320-70	2-1	3-1	4-2	3-0
Iowa	400-125	3-2	4-0	2-0	5-0
Cornell	415-145	1-1	1-1	4-1	7- 0
GA Tech A	205-405	1-2	1-1	2-0	3- 0
Berkeley A	310-130	4-0	2-0	2-0	4- 1
Iowa State	285-170	3-0	3-0	4-0	1- 2
Princeton	410-50	4-0	2-0	5-0	3- 0
Michigan A	340-155	2-1	3-1	3-0	4- 1
Harvard	365-245	1-1	4-0	4-0	2- 0
Final: GA Tech A	275-340	0-1	2-0	4- 0	3-0
TOTALS	7540-2905	21.429 ppg	28.810 ppg	31.667 ppg	29.048 ppg

MD B

Our B team, led by sophomore Adam Fine, also did well at the premier national championship of academic competition.

Opponent Team Score Zeke Adam Diamond Michelle

Iowa State 165-345 1-0 5-0 0-0 1- 0

GA Tech A 40-545 0-0 2-0 0-0 0- 0

Chicago 110-180 0-0 5-3 0-0 1- 0

Berkeley A 40-410 0-0 2-1 0-0 0- 0

Tennessee 120-185 1-0 5-0 0-0 0- 0

Michigan III 250-130 2-0 6-0 1-0 1- 0

Princeton 140-185 0-1 6-1 0-0 0- 0

Illinois II 25-175 2-0 1-1 0-0 0- 0

TX-Austin 130-135 1-0 4-4 0-0 1- 1

Rice 85-365 0-0 4-0 0-0 0-0

Wichita State 165-50 3-0 5-1 0-0 0- 0

Rochester 115-60 3-1 3-0 0-0 0- 0

Duke 50-185 0-1 4-1 0-0 0-0

Michigan IV 170-65 1-1 5-1 1-0 0- 0

TOTALS 1605-3015 8.571 ppg 36.071 ppg 1.429 ppg 2.500 ppg

Opponent	Team Score	Zeke	Adam	Diamond	Michelle
Iowa State	165-345	1-0	5-0	0-0	1- 0
GA Tech A	40-545	0-0	2-0	0-0	0- 0
Chicago	110-180	0-0	5-3	0-0	1- 0
Berkeley A	40-410	0-0	2-1	0-0	0- 0
Tennessee	120-185	1-0	5-0	0-0	0- 0
Michigan III	250-130	2-0	6-0	1-0	1- 0
Princeton	140-185	0-1	6-1	0-0	0- 0
Illinois II	25-175	2-0	1-1	0-0	0- 0
TX-Austin	130-135	1-0	4-4	0-0	1- 1
Rice	85-365	0-0	4-0	0-0	0-0
Wichita State	165-50	3-0	5-1	0-0	0- 0
Rochester	115-60	3-1	3-0	0-0	0- 0
Duke	50-185	0-1	4-1	0-0	0-0
Michigan IV	170-65	1-1	5-1	1-0	0- 0
TOTALS	1605-3015	8.571 ppg	36.071 ppg	1.429 ppg	2.500 ppg

[ Back to MAQT Home Page ]

Maintained by David Hamilton
Comments, complaints can be sent to the author at dhamiltn@wam.umd.edu
Last updated January 19, 1998.